Academics

Namagunga Primary Boarding School has consistently performed very well at the Primary Leaving Examination over the years and has been the leading star in MUKONO DISTRICT and in Uganda.  As a consequence, there is great pressure for admissions, whereby many unfortunately, are turned down.CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES

Each pupil in Namagunga Primary Boarding School belongs to a club. The following clubs are all active; Girl Guides, Brownies, Xaverians, writing Club, Environment Club, Water and Sanitation Club, Debating Club, Red cross, Legion of Mary, News Club, Wild Life Club, Games and Sports Club and Music Dance and Drama.

Other activities include taking part in Math contest (PIASCY) and Stay Alive Programme activities.

ACADEMICS: – P.L.E

Downloads

1. UNEB 2018 RESULTS (232 downloads)

2. UNEB 2017 RESULTS (517 downloads)

3. 2016 PLE Results

4. UNEB 2014 RESULTS (129 downloads)

5. Comparison of PLE Results 2011 and 2012

6. UNEB 2010 RESULTS (103 downloads)

7. SUBJECT ANALYSIS 2010 (129 downloads)

P.L.E  2015 RESULTS ANALYSIS

DIVISION ANALYSIS

DIVISION DIV. 1 DIV. 2 DIV. 3 DIV. 4 F X TOTAL
NO.OF CANDIDATES 127 20 147
PERCENTAGE 86 % 14% 100%

AGGREGATE ANALYSIS

AGG. A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TOT
NO.OFCANDIDATES 05 16 18 20 16 20 20 12 07 08 02 02 01 147
PERCENTAGE 0% 3% 11% 12% 14% 11% 14% 14% 8% 5% 5% 1% 1% 1% 100%

SUBJECT ANALYSIS

SUBJECT D1 D2 C3 C4 C5 C6 P7 P8 F9 TOT
ENG 60 86 01 147
41% 58% 01% 100%
MTC 18 49 40 19 17 03 01 147
12% 33% 27% 13% 12% 2% 1% 100%
SCI 00 61 59 20 06 01 147
00% 41% 40% 14% 4% 01% 100%
SST 16 89 36 06 147
11% 61% 24% 04% 100%

COMPARISON BETWEEN P.L.E 2013 AND 2014

AGGREGATES ANALYSIS 2014

AGG A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 A11 A12 A13 A14 TOT
No. of Candidates 08 16 17 35 27 23 10 03 02 01 142
Percentage score 6% 11% 12% 25% 19% 16% 7% 2% 1.3% 0.7% 100%

AGGREGATES ANALYSIS 2013

AGG A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 A11 A12 A13 A14 TOT
No. of Candidates 9 12 19 38 22 18 13 9 3 2 2 147
Percentage score 6% 8% 13% 26% 15% 12% 9% 6% 2% 1% 1% 100%
  • There was great improvement registered in the quality of 1st Grades

DIVISION ANALYSIS 2014

Division Div.1 Div.2 Div.3 Div.4 Div.5 Div. X TOTAL
No. of Candidates 141 01 142
Percentage score 99.3% 0.7% 100%

DIVISION ANALYSIS 2013

Division Div.1 Div.2 Div.3 Div.4 Div.5 Div. X TOTAL
No. of Candidates 143 04 147
Percentage score 97.2% 2.8% 100%
  • There was improvement registered in the number of pupils in 1st Grade from 97.2% in 2013 to 99.3% in 2014.
  • There was improvement registered in reducing the number of pupils in Division Two from 4 in 2013 to only one in 2014.

P.L.E 2012

147 CANDIDATES

SUBJECT ANALYSIS

SUBJECT ANALYSIS
GRADE DI D2 C3 C4 C5 TOTAL
ENGLISH 77 70 147
SCIENCE 24 87 31 5 147
SST 34 106 7 147
MATHEMATICS 32 85 12 12 6 147

 

AGGREGATE ANALYSIS
AGG 4 5 6 7 8 9
NO OF PUPILS 12 11 20 33 29 20
10 11 12 13 14 TOTAL
9 7 1 4 1 147

P.L.E 2011

122 CANDIDATES

SUBJECT ANALYSIS

SUBJECT D1 D2 C3 C4 C5 C6 P7 P8 F9 TOTAL
ENG 56 63 03 122
SCI 14 71 32 05 122
SST 20 76 22 04 122
MTC 12 47 34 19 06 04 122

AGGREGATE ANALYSIS

AGG.

A4

A5

A6

A7

A8

A9

A10

A11

A12

A13

A14

A15

TOTAL

NO. OF CANDIDATES

4

7

14

22

18

17

13

10

8

5

2

2

122

 

P.L.E 2010

145 CANDIDATES

SUBJECT ANALYSIS

SUBJECT ANALYSIS
D 1 D 2 C 3 C 4 C 5 C 6
ENGLISH 72 72 ……. 1 ….. ……
SCIENCE 16 92 27 9 1 ……
SOCIAL STUDIES 30 81 29 5 …… ……
MATHEMATICS 33 64 23 14 6 5

AGGREGATE ANALYSIS

AGGREGATE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
No.of candidates 8 13 21 31 19 5 15 16 7 2 6 2

 

P.L.E 2009

129 CANDIDATES

SUBJECT ANALYSIS

SUBJECT D1 D2 C3 C4 C5 C6 P7 P8 F9
ENG. 60 66 3
SST 52 66 8 3
SCI. 27 81 19 2
MATH 23 72 20 7 6 1

AGGREGATE ANALYSIS

AGGREGATE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
No.of candidates 8 13 25 25 19 18 11 4 3 2 1

P.L.E  2008  

137 CANDIDATES

SUBJECT ANALYSIS

  D1 D2 C3 C4 C5 C6 P7 P8 F9
ENG 81 51 5
SCIE 32 63 34 8
SST 45 64 24 4
MTC 39 31 27 21 15 4

AGGREGATE ANALYSIS

AGGREGATE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
No.of candidates 15 20 16 12 15 16 6 15 10 6 4 1 1

GRADE ANALYSIS

DIV 1 DIV 2 DIV 3 DIV 4
125 12

ORDER OF PERFORMANCE:

  1. ENG
  2. SST
  3. SCIE
  4. MTC

P.L.E 2007

SUBJECT ANALYSIS –

D1 D2 C3 C4 C5 C6 P7 P8 F9
ENG 91 31 1
SCIE 54 61 7 1
SST 51 69 3
MTC 27 46 25 12 10 3

AGGREGATE ANALYSIS

AGGREGATE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
No. of candidates 19 21 17 16 12 12 15 6 3 2

GRADE ANALYSIS

DIV 1 DIV 2 DIV 3 DIV 4
121 2

ORDER OF PERFORMANCE:

  1. ENG
  2. SST
  3. SCIE
  4. MTC

P.L.E 2006

We had 116 pupils and all passed in Division one and having 11 as the last aggregate.

4s 5s 6s 7s 8s 9s 10s 11s
10 13 24 26 13 16 7 7

SUBJECT ANALYSIS – YEAR 2006

SUBJECTS D1 D2 C3 C4 C5
ENGLISH 76 39 1
MATHEMATICS 14 45 33 20 4
SCIENCE 58 56 2
SST 46 66 4

 

 

\A0

AGGREGATE ANALYSIS

4s 5s 6s 7s 8s 9s 10s 11s
10 13 24 26 13 16 7 7

                                                           

GRADE   ANALYSIS

DIV 1 DIV 2 DIV 3 DIV 4
116

ORDER OF PERFORMANCE:

  1. ENG
  2.  SCIE
  3. SST
  4. MTC

P.L.E  2005

113 CANDIDATES

SUBJECT ANALYSIS- YEAR 2005

D1 D2 C3 C4 C5 C6 P7 P8
ENGLISH 85 27 01
SCIENCE 59 35 14 03 02
SST 16 66 22 08 08
MTC 20 27 18 13 16 13 06

AGGREGATE ANALYSIS

AGGREGATE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
TOTALS 6 19 17 15 08 07 10 06 9 03 04 04 03 01 01

DIVISION ANALYSIS

DIV 1 DIV2 DIV 3 DIV 4 DIV U DIV X
96 17 0 0 0 0

ORDER OF PERFORMANCE:

  1. ENG
  2. SCIE
  3. SST
  4. MTC

P.L.E  2004

113 CANDIDATESSUBJECT ANALYSIS- YEAR 2004

D1 D2 C3 C4 C5 C6 P7 P8
ENGLISH 41 70 01
SCIENCE 29 82 01
SST 58 53 01
MTC 18 30 30 24 09 01

AGGREGATE ANALYSIS YEAR 2004

AGGREGATE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
TOTALS 11 06 16 14 20 25 18 2 1

ORDER OF PERFORMANCE:

  1. ENG
  2. SCIE
  3. SST
  4. MTC

P.L.E 2003

89 CADIDATES

SUBJECT ANALYSIS

D1 D2 C3 C4 C5 C6 P7 P8
ENGLISH 46 41
SCIENCE 16 71 1
SST 23 65
MTC 25 40 13 7

AGGREGATE  ANALYSIS- YEAR 2003

AGGREGATE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
TOTALS 6 12 14 14 24 12 5 1

All candidates got first grade in 2003.

ORDER OF PERFORMANCE:

  1. ENG
  2. SST
  3. SCIE
  4. MTC

P.L.E 2002

99 CADIDATES

SUBJECT ANALYSIS

D1 D2 C3 C4 C5 C6 P7 P8
ENGLISH 72 26
SCIENCE 16 66 14 1 1
SST 12 78 7
MTC 13 46 27 6 5 1 2 1

AGGREGATE ANALYSIS

AGGREGATE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 17
TOTALS 1 3 9 14 11 5 3 2 1 1

ORDER OF PERFORMANCE:

  1. ENG
  2. SCIE
  3. SST
  4. MTC

P.L.E 2001

123 CANDIDATES

SUBJECT ANALYSIS

D1 D2 C3 C4 C5 C6 P7 P8
ENGLISH 75 48
SCIENCE 44 61 8 2
SST 25 64 17 2
MTC 10 21 22 19 27 12 5

AGGREGATE ANALYSIS

AGGREGATE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
TOTALS 6 8 13 10 13 14 14 12 9 8 3 3 1 1 1

\A0

ORDER OF PERFORMANCE:

  1.  ENG
  2. SCIE
  3. SST
  4. MTC

P.L.E 2000

116 CANDIDATES

SUBJECT ANALYSIS

D1 D2 C3 C4 C5 C6 P7 P8 F9
ENGLISH 52 45 15 2 1 1
SCIENCE 58 26 20 9 2
SST 74 34 8
MTC 10 26 38 11 10 16 2 1 2

AGGREGATE ANALYSIS

AGGREGATE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 21
TOTALS 10 17 15 16 10 7 11 5 8 3 3 2 3 3 1 2

ORDER OF PERFORMANCE:

  1. SST
  2. SCIE
  3. ENG
  4. MTC